Unistik Touch
Unistik Touch safety lancets make capillary sampling as easy and seamless as possible
Contact activation
With one-touch activation, just press the device against the sample site and it will automatically activate under pressure. After activation, the needle retracts into the device body, reducing the risk of reuse, cross-infection, and injury.
Advanced technology
Unistik Touch comes complete with Comfort Zone Technology.
Comfort Zone Technology helps make finger sampling less painful, so you can have real peace of mind. When you press the platform with its eight raised dots against the sample site, it stimulates nerve endings to send a strong comfort signal to the brain, which can help mask the lighter pain sensation from the needle¹.
Benefits
- Unistik Touch is designed to make blood sampling simple and easy.
- Comfort Zone Technology significantly reduces pain2.
- The needle retracts right after use to help reduce the risk of needlestick injuries.
- Lot number labeling helps ensure traceability and peace of mind.
- Contact activation allows for easy, one-touch, simple operation.
Unistik Touch range
| VARIANT | DEVICE COLOR | DETAIL | SUGGESTED FOR |
|---|---|---|---|
Unistik Touch 30G | Pink | 30 gauge lancet (1.5mm depth) | Frequent blood glucose testing and pediatric use. |
Unistik Touch 28G | Purple | 28 gauge lancet (1.8mm depth) | Frequent blood glucose tests and other tests such as cholesterol and hemoglobin. |
Unistik Touch 23G | Yellow | 23 gauge lancet (2.0mm depth) | Blood glucose tests and tests that need larger samples, for example, INR, liver function, cholesterol, and hemoglobin. |
Unistik Touch 21G | Orange | 21 gauge lancet (2.0mm depth) | Tests that need larger samples, like cardiac markers, coagulation, and blood gases. |
Unistik Touch 16G | Blue | 16 gauge lancet (2.0mm depth) | Tests that require much larger samples, such as comprehensive blood gas, electrolytes, blood coagulation, total bilirubin, and cardiac markers. |
More from our point-of-care testing devices
References
1. Melzack, R. and Wall, P. (1982). The Challenge of Pain. England: Penguin Books.
2. Dewland, P. and Edwards, C. (2007). A single-blind, randomized, 8-way crossover study to compare the blood volume and pain perception of capillary blood sampling. UK









